"one-China principle" is the "political foundation of Sino-US relations" and claimed that Pompeo was "out of his own political selfish interests" and "further undermined Sino-US relations and harmed peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait." , the Chinese government has stated its consistent cross-strait policy stance, rationally and mildly criticizing the outgoing Trump administration's slanted anti-China line and policies, so as to avoid a Sino-US conflict crisis when the US political parties are rotated. The Taiwan Affairs Office of the United States successively sells arms to Taiwan:
It violates the principle of one China and bulk sms service firmly opposes it Photo Credit: WebMD U.S. State Department reaffirms peaceful resolution of Taiwan issue When the reporter asked the spokesperson of the US State Department, "whether Pompeo violated the one-China policy," the State Department's reply did not directly respond to or retract Pompeo's statement, but reiterated the US "one-China policy"; The "Taiwan Relations Act" passed, the three joint communiqués between the United States and China, and the six assurances President Reagan made to Taiwan in 1982. "The United States has long adopted a one-China policy, which is clearly different from Beijing's one-China principle, under which the Chinese Communist Party claims sovereignty over Taiwan. The United States does not take a stand on Taiwan's sovereignty," a State Department spokesman said. At the same time,
It is claimed that the fundamental interest of the United States is to resolve the Taiwan issue by peaceful means, and the method must be acceptable to the people on both sides of the strait. It is worth noting that the spokesperson of the US State Department claimed to have stated that "the Chinese Communist Party advocates sovereignty over Taiwan" and "the United States does not take a stand on Taiwan's sovereignty." Sovereignty has no specific position and is still a form of "strategic ambiguity". The Trump administration's China policy has shifted from "strategic vagueness" to "strategic clarity" The Trump administration's China policy has shifted from "strategic vagueness" to "strategic clarity", but whether the Biden administration will